Hello, I am Attorney Seo Yuri, representing the plaintiff, dedicated to healing my clients' wounds with legal victories.
In adultery lawsuits, defendants often claim a reduction in alimony by stating they are "experiencing mental distress and deeply reflecting." However, the story changes if there is a reality of mocking and deceiving the plaintiff behind the apparent remorse. I will introduce the logic of how I unmasked the defendant and won this case.
π Defendant's Claim: "Reflecting Due to Depression and Financial Difficulties"
The defendant emphasized during the lawsuit that they were suffering from depression after the divorce and were in a very difficult financial situation. They also attempted to lower the alimony as much as possible by claiming they tried to stop the affair.
π‘ Plaintiff's Attorney's Winning Logic (Key Points of the Judgment)
-
Exposure of Deceptive Attitude: Even after being discovered by the plaintiff, the defendant conspired with the plaintiff's spouse and had conversations mocking the plaintiff, saying, "We can just push through with it being a difficult situation," and "The plaintiff should be satisfied with just reading the diary." Based on these conversations, I proved that the defendant's apology was an insincere 'strategic act.'
-
Proof of Proactive Role in the Affair: The defendant claimed to have tried to end the relationship, but in reality, they played a leading role in continuously inducing emotional dependence and solidifying the relationship with the plaintiff's spouse, saying, "They wouldn't have been able to live without me."
-
Blocking the Logic of Shifting Responsibility: I made it clear that the mental and economic suffering the defendant was experiencing was self-inflicted due to their affair and could not be compared to the suffering of the plaintiff, whose family was destroyed without any fault, thereby solidifying the court's conviction.
βοΈ Court's Judgment: "Defendant's Responsibility is Heavy, Acknowledging Alimony of 20 Million Won"
The court accepted the plaintiff's attorney's arguments and held the defendant heavily responsible for destroying the plaintiff's family. In particular, the circumstances in which the defendant tried to evade responsibility and deceive the plaintiff, rather than reflecting, had a decisive impact on the judgment.
A Word from the Attorney ποΈ The most powerful answer the law can show to a defendant without a sincere apology is 'accurate legal punishment.' I will logically find the defendant's malice hidden behind the evidence and resolve my client's unfairness to the end.
Need Help? If you are suffering even greater pain due to the other party's brazen attitude, consult with Attorney Seo Yuri, the plaintiff's representative with extensive experience in winning cases. π€