1. Case Overview π
This case involves a client who filed a lawsuit after discovering the affair between her husband and the defendant (the other woman), who was also a coworker. The defendant attempted to evade responsibility and reduce the amount of alimony by claiming, "It's only been a few months," and "I never urged him to get a divorce."
2. Attorney Seo Yuri's Assistance and Response Strategy π‘οΈ
We focused on meticulous 'fact-checking' to dismantle the defendant's false claims.
-
Reconstruction of the Affair Period: The defendant claimed it was only a few months, but by comparing past KakaoTalk conversations and credit card payment records, we proved that the actual affair period exceeded two years. π
-
Detection of Circumstances of Psychological Pressure: We found messages the defendant sent to the husband urging a decision, such as, "How long do I have to wait?" emphasizing her substantial responsibility for the breakdown of the marriage. π±
-
Proof of Suffering: We strongly conveyed to the court the extreme mental anguish the client experienced due to her spouse's betrayal and the defendant's brazen attitude. π
3. Case Outcome (Judgment) π
The court rejected the defendant's claim of a shortened period and ruled, "The defendant shall pay the plaintiff 20,000,000 KRW in alimony." It was a valuable victory obtained by refuting the other party's lies point by point. π
π‘ A Word from the Attorney
In alienation of affection lawsuits, the other party will try to reduce the period or evade responsibility in any way possible. However, the traces left behind do not lie. Through thorough evidence analysis, we will uncover the hidden truth and obtain fair compensation for the damages suffered by our client.